Hearn

Hearn v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20231:22-cv-00668California806 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW ALAN HEARN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00668-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al. ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT ADDITION OF Defendants. DEFENDANTS

(Doc. 14)

17 18 On June 2, 2022, Defendants City of Bakersfield and individual City defendants removed this action filed in Kern County Superior Court by Plaintiff Matthew Alan Hearn (“Plaintiff”). (Doc. 1). Defendants County of Kern, T.R. Marickel, and S. Jauch filed answers to Plaintiff’s complaint on August 25, 2022. (Doc. 10). No other Defendants answered. Several days later, the parties filed a stipulation requesting the Court continue the upcoming scheduling conference based on representations that, following the parties’ consultations, Plaintiff was preparing to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 11). Although the Defendants did not expressly manifest in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.