Bath

Bath v. Millennium Engineering and Integration Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20231:22-cv-01298California4,792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANYA BATH, No. 1:22-cv-01298-ADA-CDB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND

MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION CO.; VERTEX (ECF No. 17) AEROSPACE LLC; LINDA SODEN; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Anya Bath’s (Plaintiff) motion to remand this action to the Superior Court of California for the County of Kern. (ECF No. 17.) Pursuant to the undersigned’s standing order and Local Rule 230(g), the Court took this matter under submission to be decided on the papers on November 22, 2022. (ECF No 18.) For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. Factual and Procedural Background On March 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint for damages against Defendants Millennium Engineering and Integration Co. (MEI); Vertex Aerospace LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.