ASA Enterprise, Inc. v. Stan Boyett & Son, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASA ENTERPRISE, INC. and MANJIT Case No. 1:21-cv-00915-CDB
SINGH,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX- Plaintiffs/Counterclaim PARTE, UNOPPOSED APPLICATION TO Defendants, APPROVE STIPULATION AND RETAIN
JURISDICTION OVER SETTLEMENT
v. (Doc. 44) STAN BOYETT & SON, INC., Defendant/Counter Complainant. 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ ex-parte, unopposed application seeking an order of this Court approving the parties’ stipulation for entry of judgment and retaining jurisdiction after the parties’ anticipated dismissal of the action over the enforcement of an undisclosed settlement agreement. For the reasons set forth below, the Court declines the enter the proposed order, declines to retain jurisdiction over the enforcement of the undisclosed settlement agreement, and orders the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) within 21 days. FACTUAL BACKGROUND1…