(SS) Oka v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20231:21-cv-01569California529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBIN RENE OKA, No. 1:21-cv-1569 JLT HBK Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART THE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. REMANDING THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Commissioner of Social Security, IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF 15 Defendant. (Docs. 18, 19, and 20) 16 Robin Rene Oka asserts she is entitled to a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act and sought review of the administrative decision denying her application for benefits. The magistrate judge found the ALJ erred in evaluating Plaintiff’s subjective complaints and “did not provide clear and convincing reasons, supported by substantial evidence, for rejecting Plaintiff’s symptom claims.” (Doc. 20 at 11; see also id. at 6-11.) The magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted, the Commissioner’s cross-motion be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.