Kraft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUNE KRAFT, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00768 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ) CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR v. ) LACK OF STANDING ) TULARE COUNTY, et al., ) FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendants. ) ) (Doc. 23) ) ) 17 Rune Kraft seeks to proceed pro se in this action, alleging he is the assignee of the relevant 18 claims regarding real property purportedly owned by Pacific Real Estate Holdings, Inc. (See generally 19 Doc. 23.) As the assignee, he seeks to represent Pacific in this action. (See id. at ¶ 20 [“On March 1, 20 2021, Pacific assigned its claims related to this matter to Kraft.”].) Thus, he attempts to assert these 21 claims on behalf of Pacific, not as an individual, (see id.), and the only remedy sought is on behalf of 22 Pacific. (Id. at ¶ 47.)1 23 Significantly, however, the FAC fails to allege facts demonstrating Plaintiff has standing to 24 25 1 Plaintiff alleges that he…