(PC) Iseli v. State of CA (CDCR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20232:22-cv-01792California1,413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:22-cv-1792 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 23, 2023, it was recommended that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint that complies with the October 19, 2022 screening order. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, but did not submit an amended complaint. Rather, plaintiff reiterates that his due process rights were violated, and the court should review the previously-filed discovery as an offer of proof of such due process violations. (ECF No. 20 at 1.) Plaintiff’s objections are not entirely clear, but to the extent he contends he was denied a fair trial or his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.