Terance Frazier v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20231:20-cv-01069California898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERANCE FRAZIER, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01069-ADA-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO AMEND, REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO

v. FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN

FIVE DAYS, AND ORDERING MOTION TO

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., DISMISS BE DEEMED MOOT AND

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UPON

Defendants. FILING OF SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

16 (ECF Nos. 31, 49, 58)

18 Defendants’ motion to dismiss filed June 17, 2022, and Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend filed November 25, 2022, are currently pending adjudication. (ECF Nos. 31, 49.) Both matters were referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for the preparation of findings and recommendations, or other appropriate action. (ECF Nos. 41, 50.) The Magistrate Judge held oral argument on the motion to dismiss on November 9, 2022. (ECF Nos. 31, 46, 47, 48.) On November 25, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 49.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.