(PC) Branson v. U.S. Forest Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:19-cv-01399California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIP BRANSON, No. 2:19-cv-01399-WBS-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER U.S. FOREST SERVICE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this Bivens action against two employees of the United States Forest Service. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 4, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.