Warden

(HC) Abraria v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:21-cv-01161California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY RALPH ABRARIA, No. 2:21-cv-01161-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 07, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Petitioner was properly served. It is Petitioner’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.