(PC) Gray v. Clark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, Case No. 1:20-CV-00196-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
v. KEN CLARK, et al., (Docs. 89, 96, 108) Defendants. 16 The parties filed several motions in limine regarding evidence expected to be presented at trial (Docs. 89, 96, 108). The Court finds the matters suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and General Order 618. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On April 22, 2018, Thomas Gray was a prisoner housed at Corcoran State Prison, and Defendants Siefken, Hurtado, and Sedillo1 were correctional officers employed by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) at Corcoran. (Doc. 101 at 3.) At approximately 10:00 p.m. on April 22, 2018, Mr. Gray and another inmate were involved in a physical altercation in the dayroom of their housing unit. (Id.) Siefken and Hurtado worked as floor officers and Defendant Sedillo…