Huizare

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AREVALO JESUS ALEJANDRO, No. 2:21-CV-0230-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HUIZARE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 19. Defendants have filed a request for judicial notice in support of their motion. See ECF No. 19-1. Plaintiff has filed an opposition. See ECF No. 27. Defendants have filed a reply. See ECF No. 29. In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-94 (2007). The Court must also construe the alleged facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974); see also Hosp. Bldg. Co. v. Rex Hosp. Trustees, 425 U.S. 738, 740 (1976); Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816…