(PC) Zinda v. Amador County Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:22-cv-01990California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ZINDA, Case No. 2:22-cv-01990-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE AND

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

AMADOR COUNTY SHERIFF ORDERS DEPARTMENT, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE Defendants. DAYS

17 On November 29, 2022, I denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and directed him to submit within thirty days a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, including a certified copy of his trust account statement. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff submitted his trust account statement on December 9, 2022, ECF No. 7, but has not submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court orders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.