(SS)Alacar

(SS)Alacar v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:22-cv-00149California405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN GALAMAY ALACAR, No. 2:22-cv-00149-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under the Court’s Local Rules. On December 5, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 16), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On December 19, 2022, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17), which have been considered by the Court. The Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.