(HC)Ponce

(HC)Ponce v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20231:21-cv-01727California521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

TONY E. PONCE, 1:21-cv-01727-ADA-HBK (HC) Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Respondent. (Doc. No. 24) 15 16 17 18 Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to file a reply to Respondent’s Answer, and Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. No. 24). Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 12). Petitioner requests a 90-day extension of time, or until May 8, 2023, to file his response to Respondent’s Answer because he has limited intellectual ability and needs help preparing his legal documents, and he was suddenly transferred to a different prison and needs time to retrieve his case file and find a “new legal helper.” (Doc. No. 24 at 1-2). Petitioner also requests the Court to appoint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.