Hernandez
(PC) Villareal v. Hernandez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANTHONY VILLAREAL, Case No. 1:22-cv-01376-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
v. (ECF No. 8) HERNANDEZ, et al.,
SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
Defendants. PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY
COURT OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED
ON COGNIZABLE CLAIMS
15 (ECF No. 8)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEAD-LINE
17 18 Plaintiff Anthony Villareal (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened, 20 and he was provided leave to amend or to notify the Court that he wished to proceed on his 21 cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on February 22, 2023, is currently 22 before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 8.)
I. Screening Requirement and Standard
24 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity…