(HC)Hill

(HC)Hill v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:20-cv-01998California1,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’VAUGHN CORTEZ HILL, No. 2:20-cv-01998-TLN-DB Petitioner, v. ORDER J. ROBERTSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2254. On September 29, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations in which she recommended the petition be denied. (ECF No. 14.) Petitioner was granted thirty days to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) On December 15, 2022, this Court adopted the findings and recommendations, denied Petitioner’s petition, and entered judgment for respondent. (ECF Nos. 15, 16.) At that time, Petitioner had not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. In a document Petitioner appears to have placed in the prison mail on December 11, 2022,1 and was received by the Court on December 15, 2022, Petitioner seeks an extension of time to file objections to the magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.