(PC) Parrish v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:22-cv-02192California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA PARRISH, No. 2:22-cv-02192-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 By order filed December 27, 2022, plaintiff was granted 30 days to file a complaint in order to properly commence this civil action. ECF No. 10. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Plaintiff was warned that his failure to respond to the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 10 at 2. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that: 1. This action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 2. All pending motions be terminated. 3. The Clerk of Court close this action. ] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.