(PC) Barnes v. MCSP Case Records Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:22-cv-00003California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, No. 2:22-cv-00003-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MULE CREEK STATE PRISON CASE RECORDS OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 28, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has, however, filed a document styled as a petition for habeas corpus, in which he appears to request compensatory damages and other relief that does not involve speedier release from custody. (ECF No. 14.) The document…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.