Olfati

Olfati v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20232:21-cv-00606California2,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARVIN OLFATI, 2:21-cv-00606-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

18 Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 113) is before the court. After review of the parties’ joint statement addressing the discovery dispute (ECF No. 131), the court finds oral argument to be unnecessary. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for February 15, 2023, will be vacated. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant the motion to compel. I. Background This action arises from the May 9, 2020, seizure and arrest of plaintiff by defendant City of Sacramento (“City”) police officer(s) at plaintiff’s residence. City police came to plaintiff’s residence that day in response to 911 calls reporting a neighborhood disturbance. Plaintiff sustained a broken finger during the arrest. A resisting arrest charge against plaintiff was dismissed by the District Attorney. Plaintiff filed suit under 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.