(PC) Pelton v. Amador County, CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20232:21-cv-01968California5,336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN MICHAEL PELTON, No. 2:21-CV-1968-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 14. Plaintiff has filed an opposition. See ECF No. 15. Defendant has filed a reply. See ECF No. 16. In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-94 (2007). The Court must also construe the alleged facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Scheuer v.Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974); see also Hosp. Bldg. Co. v. Rex Hosp. Trustees, 425 U.S. 738, 740 (1976); Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). All ambiguities or doubts must also be resolved in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.