C.R.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 C.R., ET AL., Case No. 1:21-cv-01593-ADA-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER ON STIPULATION AMENDING

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. (ECF No. 35) COUNTY OF KERN, ET AL., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is the parties’ second stipulated request to extend dates relating to expert discovery. In their stipulation, the parties represent that Defendants’ police practices expert is experiencing a personal matter and cannot complete his Rule 26 report in a timely fashion. The parties’ representations and request for a limited, modest extension of dates satisfies the requirements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) to show good cause and diligence. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, based on the parties’ representations in the stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following dates and deadlines are continued as follows: 1. Designation of Expert Witnesses, previously due…