Cox

(PC) Bailey v. Cox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20231:22-cv-00757California730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY BAILEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT L. HERNEDEZ SHOULD

v. NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION

T. COX, et al., TO EFFECUTATE SERVICE OF PROCESS

Defendants. (ECF No. 19)

15 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This action proceeds on Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendants Zaragoza, Cox, Runmos, Jr., Gunn, Hernedez, and Mejia, and sexual assault claim against Defendant Mejia. (ECF No. 12.) On October 28, 2022, the Court forwarded Plaintiff the necessary service of process forms for completion and return within thirty days. (ECF No. 12.) On December 14, 2022, after Plaintiff returned the completed service of process forms, the Court issued an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.