In re Sutter Health ERISA Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Master Case No. 1:20-cv-01007-JLT In re Sutter Health ERISA Litigation ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE (Doc. 29) 15 16 Plaintiffs Christina Bonicarlo, Nicole Garcia, Ronald Hudson, Adam Blackburn, Robert 17 L. Hackett, Tabitha Hoglund, and Stephanie Chadwick (collectively, “Plaintiffs”),1 bring this 18 action individually and as participants of the Sutter Health 403(b) Savings Plan (“the Plan”) on 19 behalf of the Plan and a class of similarly situated participants and beneficiaries of the Plan. 20 (Doc. 26.) Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Sutter Health, the Retirement Benefits Investment 21 Committee (“RBIC”), and Does No. 1–10 who are members of the RBIC or other fiduciaries of 22 the plan, breached their fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 23 (“ERISA”). See 29 U.S.C. §§ 1104, 1109. Plaintiffs bring the action…