Stoeckel

Stoeckel v. Clovis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20231:22-cv-00070California786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

D daA llL enE @ L a. gA hL wL laE wN .c, oJ mR. , State Bar No. 145279 KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290 kallen@aghwlaw.com WILLIAM A. ASPINWALL, State Bar No. 308919 waspinwall@aghwlaw.com ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 697-2000 Facsimile: (415) 813-2045

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF CLOVIS, MEREDITH ALEXANDER,

TIMOTHY DRONEK, and JACOB MULHERN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO COURTHOUSE

12 DALLAS STOECKEL, Case No. 1:22-cv-00070-ADA-BAM 13 Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] v. ORDER DENYING STIPULATION CITY OF CLOVIS, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 Defendants.

18 TO THE COURT: Plaintiff DALLAS STOECKEL (“Plaintiff”), defendants CITY OF CLOVIS, MEREDITH ALEXANDER, TIMOTHY DRONEK, and JACOB MULHERN (“City Defendants”), and defendant JOHNATHAN RODRIGUEZ, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to extending all current case deadlines by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.