Trate

(HC) McCoy v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20231:22-cv-00031California1,269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD L. MCCOY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00031-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

v. ORDER1 B.M. TRATE, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

TO COMPEL MEDICAL TREATMENT

Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 48, 49) 16 17 Before the Court is Petitioner Reginald L. McCoy’s (“Petitioner”) motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 48) and motion to compel officials at USP Atwater to provide Petitioner with medical care (Doc. No. 49). Petitioner is a federal prisoner who is proceeding pro se on his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). Respondent filed a response in opposition to Petitioner’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. (Doc. No. 49). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies both motions. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.