Hearn

Hearn v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20231:22-cv-00668California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW ALAN HEARN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00668-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING COUNTY DEFENDANTS

TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD

v. NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al. AT A STATUS CONFERENCE

Defendants. (Doc. 28)

THREE-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 On June 2, 2022, Defendants City of Bakersfield and individual City defendants removed this action filed in Kern County Superior Court by Plaintiff Matthew Alan Hearn (“Plaintiff”) against those defendants and defendants of the County of Kern. (Doc. 1). On February 6, 2023, the Court noticed the scheduling of a status conference to occur at 9:00 a.m. on February 10, 2023, after which the courtroom deputy transmitted to all counsel via email information regarding the Zoom connection to be used for the status conference. On February 10, 2023, the Court convened the status conference at which Plaintiff's Counsel Phillip Gillet and City Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.