(HC) Edwards v. County of Sacramento

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. EDWARDS, No. 2:23-CV-0147-TLN-DMC-P Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s [amended] petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. Petitioner is an inmate at the Rio Consumnes Correctional Center in Elk Grove, California. In his petition, Petitioner challenges the conditions of his confinement at that facility. See ECF No. 1. Specifically, it appears that…