Thomas
(PC) Tompkins v. Thomas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN MARSHALL TOMPKINS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01415-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
v. (ECF No. 21) S. THOMAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Shawn Thompkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On January 31, 2023, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff at a settlement conference, without prejudice. (ECF No. 20). On February 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 21). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), [o]n motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been…