Thomas

(PC) Tompkins v. Thomas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20231:22-cv-01415California528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN MARSHALL TOMPKINS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01415-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 21) S. THOMAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Shawn Thompkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On January 31, 2023, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff at a settlement conference, without prejudice. (ECF No. 20). On February 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 21). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), [o]n motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.