Rayna

(PC) Rodriguez v. Rayna

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20231:19-cv-01788California4,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERLINDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., 1:19-cv-01788-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS

CARRANZA-RICO AND REYNA’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 51)

L. RAYNA, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds against Defendants J. Carranza-Rico and L. Reyna for a December 3, 2018, denial of food claim and against Defendant Reyna for a separate December 4, 2018 denial of food claim in violation of the Eighth Amendment I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 On April 25, 2022, the previously assigned magistrate judge issued an Order Granting Defendants’ Exhaustion-Based Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Doc. 48.) Specifically, the Court held that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies regarding a December 13, 2018 deprivation of food…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.