(PC)Seymour

(PC)Seymour v. Shirley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20231:22-cv-00938California4,554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 AARON D. SEYMOUR, Case No. 1:22-cv-00938-JLT-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE DENIED

H. SHIRLEY, et al., (ECF No. 20)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

14 15 I. INTRODUCTION Aaron D. Seymour (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The complaint commencing this action was filed on July 29, 2022. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that the water at Wasco State Prison is contaminated, and that defendants Shirley, Degough, and Cronjager have not appropriately responded to the issue. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and allowed the case to proceed on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against defendants Shirley, Degough, and Cronjager. (ECF No. 9). On February 9, 2023, defendants Cronjager and Shirley moved “to dismiss the complaint against them…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.