Beard

Beard v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20231:21-cv-00841California6,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-ADA-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF

v. DOCUMENTS

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 15, 2023

HEARING

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 59, 61, 62, 63)

17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to compel Defendant County of Stanislaus (“Defendant”) to produce documents in response to Plaintiff Beard’s requests for production, set three (“RPD3”). (ECF No. 59.) Defendant filed an opposition and Plaintiffs filed a unilateral statement of discovery dispute on February 1, 2023. (ECF Nos. 61, 62.) The parties filed a joint statement of discovery disagreement on February 2, 2023. (ECF No. 63.) The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and the parties will not be required to appear on February 15, 2023. See Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons explained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.