(SS) Russell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20232:21-cv-01595California4,512 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN CHRISTINE RUSSELL, No. 2:21-cv-01595 CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying applications for Disability Income Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), respectively. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in the case, including the entry of final judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Commissioner’s cross- motion for summary judgment. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1964, has a high school education and worked as a retail store manager, sales associate, cashier, and kitchen helper over a 15-year period. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 29, 76, 236. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.