Martinez
(PS) Grant v. Martinez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. GRANT, Case No. 2:20-cv-01963-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDERS
LUIS MARTINEZ, et al., ECF No. 49 Defendants.
16 On January 11, 2023, the court issued an order setting an initial scheduling conference for February 16, 2023, and directed the parties to file status reports by no later than February 2, 2023. ECF No. 49. Defendants timely submitted a status report. Plaintiff, however, failed to file his own status report. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,…