Palomares

Palomares v. City of Arvin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20231:21-cv-01745California835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL PALOMARES, Case No. 1:21-cv-01745-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION v. AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER AS

MODIFIED

CITY OF ARVIN, et al., (Doc. 25) Defendants. 16 On July 1, 2022, the Court entered a Scheduling Order in this case consistent with the parties’ jointly requested timeline to complete discovery, including provision for eight months to complete fact discovery, nine months to complete expert discovery and ten months to file dispositive motions. (Docs. 16, 17) Among other things, the Scheduling Order sets forth:

The dates set in this order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.