Palomares
Palomares v. City of Arvin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL PALOMARES, Case No. 1:21-cv-01745-JLT-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION v. AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER AS
MODIFIED
CITY OF ARVIN, et al., (Doc. 25) Defendants. 16 On July 1, 2022, the Court entered a Scheduling Order in this case consistent with the parties’ jointly requested timeline to complete discovery, including provision for eight months to complete fact discovery, nine months to complete expert discovery and ten months to file dispositive motions. (Docs. 16, 17) Among other things, the Scheduling Order sets forth:
The dates set in this order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief…