Mimms

(PC) Minor v. Mimms

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20231:22-cv-01612California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY RAY MINOR, 1:22-cv-01612-HBK (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

TEN DAY DEADLINE

MARGARET MIMMS, Defendant.

16 17 18 Plaintiff Anthony Ray Minor initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 15, 2022, while detained in the Fresno County Jail. (Doc. No. 1). Because Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis failed to comply with § 1915(a)(1)(2), the Court ordered Plaintiff on January 4, 2023 to resubmit a completed application or pay the $402.00 filing fee within 21 days, with failure to timely do so cause for dismissal. (Doc. No. 5). As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (See docket) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) permits courts to involuntarily dismiss an action when a litigant fails to prosecute an action or fails to comply with a court order. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.