Morgan

Morgan v. Hobbs

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20232:22-cv-01941California639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIE MORGAN, No. 2:22-cv-01941-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v.

JACYLN HOBBS, VICTORIA STAEBLER,

NATALIE DAVEY, SAMATHA SAECHO,

MARISA SANDOVAL, DULCE OLIVARES,

VANESSA SEGOVIA-OVIEDO, JOANNA

MORENO, JANELLE, SCHUSTER,

MICHELLE CALLEJAS, SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF CHILD, FAMILY, AND

ADULT SERVICES, BETHANY

PETERSON, H.O.P.E. THERAPEUTIC

SERVICES, SAMUEL T. ROUNSEVILLE,

KATHLEEN L. ROUNSEVILLE, AND DOES 1 through 24, inclusive, Defendants. 22 Defendant Bethany Peterson moves to dismiss plaintiff Jamie Morgan’s sixth cause of 24 action for therapeutic negligence to the extent pled against her. Because this entire action was improperly removed to federal court, the court cannot rule on the motion and instead remands to 26 the Sacramento County Superior Court. This action was originally filed in the Sacramento County Superior Court. In October 2022, defendants County of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.