Sapien

(PC) Vaccaro v. Sapien

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20232:22-cv-01984California1,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DION JERMAINE RANDOL VACCARO, No. 2:22-cv-01984-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SAPIEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After dismissal of the original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (ECF No. 12), plaintiff has filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 18), which the court must screen.1 The amended complaint alleges that in October of 2021, defendants Sapien, Wilson, Plassmeyer, Incompero, and Houlston each “in some fashion” were involved in the theft of plaintiff’s outgoing mail containing “semi-nude” pictures of plaintiff’s wife. ECF No. 18 at 1-2. Plaintiff alleges that the theft was not an honest mistake but rather a “crime” committed with a wrongful intent that has caused him mental anguish. Id. Plaintiff does not state which defendant

1 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.