(PC) DeBose v. Third Watch Commander

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20232:23-cv-00131California1,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWIGHT M. DEBOSE, No. 2:23-cv-00131-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER THIRD WATCH COMMANDER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint, he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and screen the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.