Gilbert v. Save Mart Supermarkets

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20231:22-cv-00117California164 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00117-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF

v. DEFENDANT SAVE MART

SUPERMARKETS ONLY

SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants. 15 On February 15, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing all claims against Defendant Save Mart Supermarkets with prejudice. (ECF No. 25). In light of the parties’ 1g Stipulation, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Qi), the case against only Defendant Save Mart Supermarkets has been dismissed with prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Save Mart Supermarkets as a pending defendant on the docket. 22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated: _ February 16, 2023 [spe ey —

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28