Gilbert v. Save Mart Supermarkets
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00117-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
v. DEFENDANT SAVE MART
SUPERMARKETS ONLY
SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants. 15 On February 15, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing all claims against Defendant Save Mart Supermarkets with prejudice. (ECF No. 25). In light of the parties’ 1g Stipulation, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Qi), the case against only Defendant Save Mart Supermarkets has been dismissed with prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Save Mart Supermarkets as a pending defendant on the docket. 22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 Dated: _ February 16, 2023 [spe ey —
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28