Kinross

(PC) Elias v. Kinross

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20232:17-cv-02106California564 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEIRON M. ELIAS, No. 2:17-cv-02106-WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE FROM

PLAINTIFF

JENNIFER BENAVIDEZ,

Defendant.

17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se1 with a claim for prospective injunctive relief under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”). The time for filing dispositive motions expired and the dispositive motion filed was resolved. Plaintiff then filed an interlocutory appeal which has been dismissed. (ECF Nos. 78, 81.) In advance of setting a further schedule for this litigation, including due dates for pretrial statements, the court previously inquired as to each party’s position on the usefulness of scheduling a settlement conference. Specifically, by order signed on November 15, 2022, and filed on November 16, 2022, the court ordered that within 14 days, “each party shall file a notice

1 Plaintiff’s previous representation by limited purpose counsel terminated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.