Singh

Singh v. Bardini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20231:22-cv-01202California185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 HARMANDEEFP SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01202-ADA-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE

12 EMILIA BARDINI, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendants. (ECF No. 13) 14 On February 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal. (ECF No. 13.) In light of the 16 notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gii); Wilson v. 17 City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice, 18 with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FA. 53 Dated: _February 17, 2023

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.