(PC) Roberts v. CSP Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, No. 2:22-cv-02102-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 6, 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to, within 21 days, show cause why this case should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. ECF No. 9. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has failed to respond to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or unwilling to show that this action should not be dismissed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. ///// ///// ] Further, it…