Asman

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20232:20-cv-00195California2,866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiffs, ORDER AND v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ADAM ASMAN, et al., (ECF Nos. 226, 227, 242, 246) Defendants. 16 Four motions filed by individual defendant Stephen DeNigris, Ph.D., are before the court. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned grants defendant’s motion to serve additional discovery (ECF No. 242) and vacates the hearing set for March 1, 2023. The parties’ joint statement on Dr. DeNigris’ further discovery motion (ECF No. 246) is due no later than March 1, 2023. The undersigned will recommend that defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to punitive damages (ECF No. 227) be denied. The undersigned will deny the motion for protective order pertaining to defendant’s personal financial information (ECF No. 226) without prejudice to renewal in compliance with Local Rule 251. I. Background This action arises…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.