(PS) Warfield v. Solano County Public Defenders Offices

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRODERICK J. WARFIELD, No. 2:22-cv-00782-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 26, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff filed objections on February 2, 2023 and February 8, 2023, and both were considered by the Court. (ECF Nos. 33, 36.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the…