Woodral

Woodral v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20231:20-cv-00372California13,565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMANDA DAWSON, GARRETT Case No. 1:20-CV-372-BAM

WOODRAL, DUSTIN WOODRAL,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 v. (Doc. Nos. 31, 32)

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, NATHAN

CRAIN, Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Amanda Dawson, Garrett Woodral, and Dustin Woodral (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this civil action alleging a violation of their civil rights in connection with an allegedly unlawful attack by a Stanislaus County police dog on Donnie Woodral (“Mr. Woodral”) during a traffic stop. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication have been fully briefed and are now pending before the Court. (Docs. 31-32, 36, 38, 40-41.) Having considered the record, the parties’ briefs and arguments, and the relevant law, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary adjudication in its entirety, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.