Woodral
Woodral v. County of Stanislaus
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMANDA DAWSON, GARRETT Case No. 1:20-CV-372-BAM
WOODRAL, DUSTIN WOODRAL,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 v. (Doc. Nos. 31, 32)
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, NATHAN
CRAIN, Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Amanda Dawson, Garrett Woodral, and Dustin Woodral (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this civil action alleging a violation of their civil rights in connection with an allegedly unlawful attack by a Stanislaus County police dog on Donnie Woodral (“Mr. Woodral”) during a traffic stop. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication have been fully briefed and are now pending before the Court. (Docs. 31-32, 36, 38, 40-41.) Having considered the record, the parties’ briefs and arguments, and the relevant law, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary adjudication in its entirety, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion for summary…