Warden

(HC) Reyes v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20231:22-cv-01392California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS REYES, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-1392 JLT HBK (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF ) HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECTING THE WARDEN, FCI Mendota, ) CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE ) Respondent. ) (Docs. 3, 5) ) ) The assigned magistrate judge conducted a preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that the Petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. 5.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on all parties on January 10, 2023 and advised them that any objections were to be filed within 14 days of service. (Id.) In addition, the Court advised the parties that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id.at 5, citing Wilkerson v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.