Gastelo

(HC) Orosco v. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20232:19-cv-02624California1,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Anthony Nabor Orosco, No. 2:19-cev-02624-KJM-DMC Petitioner, ORDER v. Josie Gastelo, 1S Respondent. 16 Anthony Nabor Orosco, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, petitions for a 18 writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under this District’s local rules. The Magistrate Judge has filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections. See generally F&Rs, ECF No. 18. Orosco objected. See generally Objs., ECF No. 21. Respondent neither objected nor responded to Orosco’s objections. In his objections, Orosco identifies no factual errors in the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. The court has located none. The court also has reviewed the Magistrate 25 Judge’s legal conclusions de novo. See Robbins v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.