(PC) Hampton v. Austin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20232:20-cv-01001California512 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY G. HAMPTON, JR., No. 2:20-cv-01001-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LORI W. AUSTIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On August 17, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. The Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing plaintiff’s action after the court warned plaintiff “that the failure to oppose the [pending] motion [to dismiss] could be construed as consent to the relief requested.” F&R at 1, ECF No. 32. Plaintiff timely filed objections. See Obj., ECF No. 33. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.