Hicks
(PC) Washington v. Hicks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-JLT-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND MOTION
vs. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
HICKS, et al., (ECF No. 116.)
Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendant Sergeant David Hicks for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)1 26 1 On June 22, 2020, the court issued an order dismissing all other claims and defendants 27 from this action, except against Defendants Rocha and Hicks for use of excessive force, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 19.) On August 11, 2022, Defendant Rocha’s motion for terminating sanctions was granted and Defendant Rocha was…