CDCR

(PC) Carroll v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20231:23-cv-00005California1,738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 1:23-cv-00005-JLT-SAB (PC) 7 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL BE CDCR, et al., DENIED 10 Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

12 Plaintiff Tremaine Carroll is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and appointment of counsel, filed February 16, 2023. Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction to ensure her safety against the “green wall.” Plaintiff also seeks appointment of counsel. I. DISCUSSION A. Preliminary Injunction The primary purpose of a preliminary injunction is preservation of the status quo. See, e.g., Ramos v. Wolf, 975 F.3d 872, 887 (9th Cir. 2020). More specifically, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.